🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "significant and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on freedom have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Using Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being defended by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. There should be widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but perverts it.

"If you cannot draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot establish limits at democracy," commented a prominent American author, whose words that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to take action.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish identity with the actions of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning boundary by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for carrying signs opposing genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may ultimately regret how casually we permitted them to slip away.