🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include lowering the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about industry interference with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

The WHO in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, noting that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.