🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.